🔗 Share this article AI Chatbots Provide ‘Unreliable and Biased’ Election Guidance, Claims Dutch Watchdog AI chatbots have been shown to be “unreliable and clearly biased” when offering voting advice, the Dutch data protection authority (AP) has stated, issuing warnings about a potential threat to democratic processes just over a week before national elections. Testing Reveals Repeated Partiality in Chatbot Recommendations The four chatbots tested by the authority “often end up with the same two parties”, regardless of the user’s question or command, the watchdog noted in a analysis published ahead of the late October vote. For over 50% of instances, the AI recommended either the right-wing PVV of Geert Wilders or the progressive GroenLinks-PvdA headed by the former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans. Certain groups, such as the moderate CDA, “are rarely ever cited”, even when the voter’s query precisely aligns with the stances of these political entities, the study indicated. Authority Figure Cautions Against Relying on AI Assistants for Election Advice The deputy head of the AP, the official Monique Verdier, stated that while AI assistants appear to be smart resources, “for election guidance, they repeatedly fall short”. Voters were being pushed toward a political group that might not correspond to their political views, she added. “This directly impacts a fundamental pillar of democracy: the integrity of free and fair elections,” Verdier stated. “We therefore warn against using AI chatbots for voting advice, as their operation is unclear and hard to confirm.” Voting Background and Political Landscape Netherlands citizens vote on 29 October in an electoral contest that will be closely watched around Europe for the showing of the Freedom party. The far-right party of Wilders is leading the polls but the gap to the left-wing and centre-right parties appears to be narrowing, with many voters yet to make up their minds. Every significant political faction have ruled out an alliance with the Freedom party, implying the party that comes second is most likely to supply the future head of government. Inadvertent Prejudice Attributed to AI Operation The authority emphasised that the bots were not deliberately biased, and that their “identified shortcomings” are a result of the way AI chatbots operate.