🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “endless energy” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a heart of gold.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and animal rights activists.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned debate over their destiny often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the Canadian government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to put them down unless the government covers the upkeep of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something Kristy Burgess learned personally.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so amazed by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She developed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each transformed the way I view connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her interaction with the whales evolved against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their confinement.

During her tenure at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, died. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which advocates say reflects the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The facility did not open to the guests over the summer, but the former trainer says she saw with her own eyes results of the closure. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but in the past asserted: “The whales … receive far superior health care and constant care than any individual in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was fired from the facility in early March following the passing of Eos, an ailing beluga the park staff had to humanely kill. She said the park thought details of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was released soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and staff members in despair. She says the facility’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any attempts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense personnel”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She supports demands for the whales to be transferred promptly from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel.

In late September, Canada’s fisheries minister turned down a request to export the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the application would have meant a continued existence in enclosure and a return to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As society, we know that whales should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience authorize an relocation that would prolong the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments indicate a wider lack of awareness of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a resolution, ideas have been put forward, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The prospective location, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a viable approach in the coming months.

An official, head of the initiative, said the location will mimic the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|